A single 1989-90 DIA evaluation kept funding remote viewing for the intelligence community; the paperwork proves continuation, not clairvoyance.
A 1980 memo shows STAR GATE’s remote viewing unit given a live operational job during the hostage crisis, though the record stops well short of proving it worked.
A 1997 in-house CIA study says the agency studied UFO reports for decades and chose not to disclose it, but the admission comes from one historian summarising files the agency selected for him.
A Statistical Science meta-analysis claiming above-chance telepathy scores sat in STAR GATE’s files; it never left the debate stage.
Declassified Star Gate manuals show a genuine anti-cueing protocol, sealed targets, blind monitors, independent scoring, that survived scrutiny without proving remote viewing itself.
A declassified Addiction Research Center trial produced clean pharmacological data on two drugs the agency wanted weaponised.
The 1977 Senate hearings corroborated a decade of CIA-run safe houses where LSD was slipped to men who never agreed to anything.
Richard Helms told Sidney Gottlieb to destroy MKULTRA in 1973, and he mostly did; the accountants kept their own copies.
Sherman Kent’s 1950s experiment showed that vague probability words scatter across a range so wide they become useless for intelligence judgement.
A forum thread about an online crane game’s overly generous assist mode got filed under UFO news; it isn’t.
A two-hour-plus compilation of familiar UAP footage gets reposted as if it were fresh disclosure.
Heuer’s Analysis of Competing Hypotheses survived decades of use inside CIA by grading evidence against rejection, not confirmation.
Six arrests and a canceled BSc paper make headlines; the underlying claim, a surgical camera smuggling a sealed exam, remains police assertion, not proven fact.
A commissioned poll says news coverage boosts alien belief, but the survey itself is more media fodder than data.
NRC’s plea for accountability reads like moral theatre until you check what evidence actually backs the claim.
Skeptic.com traces how a 1940s cover-up myth outlived every chance to prove itself.
Jessica Utts found a real statistical signal in the remote-viewing files. Ray Hyman found control flaws that explained it without one. Both reports are on the record. Neither has moved since 1995. The programme’s real error was not the disagreement; it was treating a lab effect as proof the field would follow. It didn’t: 59 operational cases, outcome unconfirmed.
The CIA spent two decades trying to build a controllable mind. It killed a man, proved nothing, and then set fire to the evidence.
Purus ut praesent facilisi dictumst sollicitudin cubilia ridiculus.
