Richard Helms told Sidney Gottlieb to destroy MKULTRA in 1973, and he mostly did; the accountants kept their own copies.
Sherman Kent’s 1950s experiment showed that vague probability words scatter across a range so wide they become useless for intelligence judgement.
A forum thread about an online crane game’s overly generous assist mode got filed under UFO news; it isn’t.
A two-hour-plus compilation of familiar UAP footage gets reposted as if it were fresh disclosure.
Heuer’s Analysis of Competing Hypotheses survived decades of use inside CIA by grading evidence against rejection, not confirmation.
Six arrests and a canceled BSc paper make headlines; the underlying claim, a surgical camera smuggling a sealed exam, remains police assertion, not proven fact.
A commissioned poll says news coverage boosts alien belief, but the survey itself is more media fodder than data.
NRC’s plea for accountability reads like moral theatre until you check what evidence actually backs the claim.
Skeptic.com traces how a 1940s cover-up myth outlived every chance to prove itself.
Jessica Utts found a real statistical signal in the remote-viewing files. Ray Hyman found control flaws that explained it without one. Both reports are on the record. Neither has moved since 1995. The programme’s real error was not the disagreement; it was treating a lab effect as proof the field would follow. It didn’t: 59 operational cases, outcome unconfirmed.
The CIA spent two decades trying to build a controllable mind. It killed a man, proved nothing, and then set fire to the evidence.
Purus ut praesent facilisi dictumst sollicitudin cubilia ridiculus.
